Mises and Madison

"With respect to the two words 'general welfare,' I have always regarded them as qualified by the DETAIL of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a METAMORPHOSIS of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." -April 20, 1831 Letter from James Madison (dubbed Father of the U.S. Constitution for his role in drafting of the text; see also The Federalist Papers, published on behalf of the American system as one of limited government of by and for the people of A Free Republic)~

"MODERN CRYPTODESPOTISM, which arrogates to itself the name of liberalism, finds fault with the negativity of the concept of freedom. The censure is spurious as it refers merely to the grammatical form of the idea and does not comprehend that all civil rights can be as well defined in affirmative as in negative terms. THEY ARE NEGATIVE AS THEY ARE DESIGNED TO OBVIATE AN EVIL, NAMELY THE OMNIPOTENCE OF THE POLICE POWER [OF GOVERNMENT], AND TO PREVENT THE STATE FROM BECOMING TOTALITARIAN." -Ludwig von Mises in chapter 21, The Theory of Money and Credit~

Prov. 11:3 - If the foundations be destroyed, what shall the righteous do?



Monday, April 23, 2012

SITREP! MUST SEE/SHARE/TWEET LINK video

This video has to go viral, it was released by FreeMarketAmerica.org which itself was just launched on Friday 04/20/2012. A friend sent me a link to the video which I'm sharing here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=youtube_gdata_player

This group actually started from two other organizations, which are "Free Market Florida," If I'm not mistaken, and "Americans For Limited government" which have joined together as I intend to do also.

Obviously, I am also doing outreach communications and analysis along the lines of what this video attempts to speak against as well as speak for! I am working in my own presentation as do many many more Americans because we are in the late stages of a Fabian, Menshevik, Gramscian, LIEberal socialist revolution it is moving us more and more towards the fascist corporatist state control model where "the commerce clause" of the US constitution authorizes the government to takeover anything any industry and control of what you may or may not purchase because they are arguing that x,y, or z economic activity or non-activity impacts the whole nation. Well, all economic activity impacts the nation!

They are doing this and more! They've gotten this far with mendacious characters like Obama and many others.

Sociology professors Francis Fox Piven and her husband Cloward authored the Cloward Piven strategy in the 1960s or 70s which was designed to make the American economy the free market capitalist system collapse and thus create a crisis which these "progressives" could usher in more government control over our lives.

As they have been engaged in this project they have also followed professor Saul Alinsky's gangster/power relations model where their main opponent is a democratic republic and it's constitution and as the constitutionally weaker yet typically very wealthy party they must impose their agenda on America and her people through quite socialist means which if we look closely involves revolution and plunder following the ENRON accounting SCAN AND SHAM model.

And I'll have much more on this! Material and evidence.

I have not posted for a pretty long time as I have had to take are of many commitments, so I appreciate everyone's patience. Thank you.

I'm actually posting this from a phone and I have to run!

-the management/defendit aka chris


----------
UPDATE:
If the argument is that congress
or obama (neither of which have kept their promises already in severL related respects) has the power to mandate individuals to participate in commerce by forcing individuals across the nation to purchase x,y, or z, in the name of healthcare reform then they have removed a very important check on the authority of federal govt which they have no authority to do under the constitution which they swore to uphold. That's it, end of issue on Obamacare. At least it's supposed to be.

Yet we are I the situation we are in because we are dealing with committed Marxists, Utopianis, and widespread economic ignorance. This is why it is time to start thinking about capitalism and true empowerment entrepreneurship, enlightenment, outreach, training and communication.

Most Americans don't vote they see t as just two idiots arguing with eachother and business as usual. If they see what is happening and we expose the Marxist agenda and make the contrast and case for capitalism in a real and effective way, then we may improve our economic situation and chances for progress and prosperity again.

The presidential and general elections of 2012 are just the beginning for us and those just joining and becoming aware of what is going on here: the battle between those who believe in "transforming" America into something fundamentally her opposite and those of us calling for revolution against their ideology and agenda.

Obama and his "carefully chosen" Marxist and agitated radical often anti-American friends reminds me of the carnival conman in pinnochio who promised fun and games, happy days ahead: little did the young gullible children know they would become donkeys and be worked and ridden like asses.

As I said above, Its a major sham and scam/deception model/operation which parallels and continues from Enron, Lay, Gore, KRUGMAn; Fannie Freddie Funkyness; Cloward Piven; NY Times Walter Duranty; Reverse Perestroika, Jon Corzine, MF Global; Warren Buffet and his Nebraska owned railway project and interests groups opposed to TransCanada pipeline; Jamie Gorelick (see "crime punished and unpunished" on powerlineblog + "investigate this!" By Ann Coulter ) and on and on...

They are engaged in an epic Revolution and plunder campaign, again it's Cloward-Piven with a dash of Saul Alinsky Chicago-gangster emulating politicos who have gotten away with so much already they feel invincible. Stopping them in 2012 is just the first step in straightening things out and saving America from their reverse-Bizarro version Glasnost Perestroika and reverse-Reagan Marxist international agenda.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

+Save Capitalism, Save America+

In Seven Things I Learned About Transition From Communism, Russian-born Harvard economics professor Andrei Shleifer pointed out that "recovery and rapid growth occured nearly everywhere" after temporary declines as Russia and the Soviet states transitioned -or to use a recently more fashionable term, "transformed" - their economies to more capitalistic ones. And, yes, "economic transformation takes time." Nothing too shattering or surprising really. Read the whole thing if you like. Its just a click away at the hyperlink in the first sentence here.

There are some people who would argue for (and some of them working towards) going in the opposite direction despite its expected ruinous and tyrannical effects on everyone upon who this mad experiment and ideology is imposed.

Transitioning or "transforming" TO Communism away from Capitalism means increased poverty, misery and authoritarianism. This is because, as Adam Smith so astutely emphasized, "the property which every man has in his own labour, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable." 

I'de like to share a quote from Mark Levin's Ameritopia here, to further explain the situation:
As Karl Popper noted, Vladimir "Lenin was quick to realize [that] Marxism was unable to help in practical economics. 'I do not know of any socialist who has dealt with these problems... there was nothing written about such matters in Bolshevik textbooks or in those of the Mensheviks.'
As Lenin admits, 'there is hardly a word on the economics of socialism to be found in Marx's work...'
Man's nature and history are not neatly defined through economic classes, whose members are easily categorized. To say that man exists in essentially one of two economic conditions - a bourgeois or capitalist/landlord class or a proletariat or working class, with the former perpetually exploiting the latter and the latter perpetually exploited by the former - is simply erroneous.
The likelihood of [Communism's] ruling proletariat might break into factions and internal power struggles, with would-be masterminds competing for control over the society; or that once in position to exercise absolute power a dictator or supreme party would voluntarily surrender their power and wither away [when it was theoretically time for the classless utopia to grow out of all this hypothetically brilliant socialism] are not even addressed in the Communist Manifesto. To have done so, however, would have required Marx and Engels to [...] acknowledge the hopelessness of their utopia [...] Notwithstanding one hundred years of communist tyranny and mass genocide, the fanatics cling to their utopia.
See also 


-ECONOMIC CALCULATION IN THE SOCIALIST COMMONWEALTTH by Ludwig von Mises
http://mises.org/econcalc/ch1.asp
-MIDDLE OF THE ROAD POLICY LEADS TO SOCIALISM by Ludwig von Mises
http://mises.org/midroad/mr2.asp
-AN INTRODUCTION TO AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS by Thomas C. Taylor
http://mises.org/austecon/chap1.asp
-THE FUTURE OF LIBERTY by George Reisman
http://www.capitalism.net/Future%20of%20Liberty.html



R.I.P. Andrew Breitbart


With a terrible feeling of pain and loss we announce the passing of Andrew Breitbart.

Andrew passed away unexpectedly from natural causes shortly after midnight this morning in Los Angeles.

We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior.

Andrew lived boldly, so that we more timid souls would dare to live freely and fully, and fight for the fragile liberty he showed us how to love.

Andrew recently wrote a new conclusion to his book, Righteous Indignation:
I love my job. I love fighting for what I believe in. I love having fun while doing it. I love reporting stories that the Complex refuses to report. I love fighting back, I love finding allies, and—famously—I enjoy making enemies.
THREE YEARS AGO, I WAS MOSTLY A BEHIND-THE-SCENES GUY WHO LINKED STUFF ON A VERY POPULAR WEBSITE.  I ALWAYS WONDERED WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE TO ENTER THE PUBLIC REALM TO FIGHT FOR WHAT I BELIEVE IN. I’ve lost friends, perhaps dozens. But I’ve gained hundreds, thousands—who knows?—of allies. At the end of the day, I can look at myself in the mirror, and I sleep very well at night.
Andrew is at rest, yet the happy warrior lives on, in each of us
What Andrew learned, and what he demonstrated through his actions, is that it takes a radical to beat a radical.  As I said before, in Left vs. Right, the Bottom Line , it takes a radical to know one and to expose one and defeat one.

There are the big government Socialist/Marxist/Communist radicals, and then there are those like Andrew Breitbart and Glenn Beck, and Sarah Palin, who are against big government and they are for the American Constitution of limited government and who rely more on tradition and their own ideas and labors when it comes to their personal lives, their mission, and their politics.

What sets Breitbart and Palin and others such as Allen West and Herman Cain as well as many others, and Ron Paul, as misguided as he is about defense and who's fault it is for the hate that exists in the Mideast, is that they are all in the fight and they have stood against liars and cheats and coercive radical revolutionaries and it really has taken all of their effort and focus to do so. They took the extra steps and went the extra mile. Because they understand what is going on and what is at stake. They understand that we are in a non-kinetic civil war, and what appears to be the LATE stages of a socialist revolution and the destruction of America from within which has been in the works while the ideas behind it are nothing new and have been refuted.

The task at hand is to show this, and to share it wide and far. And it is really a fight, because there are those who do not wish the truth to be known. So one must really stand up to them, their manipulations, interests and power. And remember Saul Alinsky taught them how to gain power to achieve their utopian fundamentally unAmerican extremist agenda. Breitbarthas demonstrated to and shown many how to fight back. God rest his soul now.

Here's Andrew at his last Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC 2012): 

And the next video which follows reveals how he stood up for the silent majority of Americans who believe in the American constitution and who see how people have been manipulated by socialist and communist radicals who have been trying to "transform" America into exactly what the constitution was written to protect us all from.

This next video shows how the Saul Alinsky "community organizer"/socialist astroturf program works..

Notice the organizers didn't want their followers to talk to Breitbart so they would remain ignorant and see how they are manipulated. It was obviously a union "workers of the world unite" protest (probably SEIU) except they didn't wear their union stuff. They could not answer Breitbart's arguments or his questions about what is going on and what he and Glenn Beck are trying to tell them.

It is really a microcosm of what Andrw was trying to do in Los Angeles and across the country, especially in "Blue" and leftist radical dominated areas which is to inform those who need to know, those who would wake up once the people misguiding them were exposed for what they were really up to. It is going to take getting into the belly of the beast and exposing the left's shout-you-down false narrative and controlling tactics. Especially when it comes to the campuses which need to be liberated from counterproductive and useless LIE-beral blame-America first Marxist revolutionary radicalizing indocrtination/brainwashing factories from where all this nonsense -and more-  originates.

It is going to take an Army of Breitbarts, or Davids, so to speak, to do this. 
As one writer famously stated, in an age of universal deception it becomes revolutionary to tell the truth.

Rest in peace Andrew Breitbart, you will be sorely missed. From the bottom of my heart, thank you so much for your service to your country.

In your honor, here at Free Market American/Free Market Circle, and everyone in the American Conservative/Tea party we are all patriot radicals today.

And until America's constitutional order is restored and followed by our so-called political leaders, judges, and government officials who openly defy the supreme law of the land by which they claim the very positions and authority they hold and OCCUPY.

=+=

UPDATE:
((in - memorium ~ guisto solegno))
LINK/BREITBART'S VOICEMAIL CHEWING OUT GAWKER WRITER FOR SLANDER ON CONSERVATIVES BY LABELLING A MURDERER 'RIGHT WING' [[LANGUAGE WARNING]]
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/04/Breitbart%20Gawker%20Voicemail


LINK/NEIL CAVUTO REMEMBERS BREITBART
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV?id={A561EE7B-ECB4-485E-9A47-8F57AA490BF0}&title=Neil%20Cavuto%20Remembers%20BreitbartV

LINK/ACTOR, FRIEND, ADAM BALDWIN REMEMBERS ANDREW BREITBART WITH ED MORRISSEY
http://www.mrctv.org/videos/adam-baldwin-discusses-andrew-breitbart

LINK/ALFONZO RACHERL 'Zo' WEBLOG ON BREITBART
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdOtgHPsAGg

LINK/COULTER, KUDLOW, REMEMBER BREITBART
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV?id={A97289E7-1B42-48B0-AD48-9E0D074CCB3A}&title=Coulter%20Kudlow%20Remember%20Breitbart

LINK/ANDREW BREITBART FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE VS. DEMOCRAT-MEDIA COMPLEX AKA LIE-BERAL TROJAN HORSE OF MANIPULATION. HOW ITS DONE. 
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV?id={240BE779-5636-4F99-9805-02634D6B5BBE}&title=Man%20Of%20The%20People%20Breitbart%20Takes%20Call%20From%20Citizen%20Journalist%20During%20Speech


LINK/PJTV REMEMBERS A TRUE PATRIOT. Bill Whittle, Roger L. Simon, Lionel Chetwynd, Stephen Kruiser on the impact of Andrew Breitbart
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA2YIQr1XM4&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PLDB489EE7574F01D0

LINK/Bill Whittle: My Friend Andrew
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95-C8uPez50

LINK/GREG GUTFELD RED EYE REMEMBERS ANDREW BREITBART
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_s7yirG63w

LINK/Andrew Breitbart RIP -Richard Brookhiser 
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/292444/andrew-breitbart-rip-richard-brookhiser

Robert Stacy McCain: The Breitbart Experience
http://spectator.org/archives/2012/03/02/the-breitbart-experience

Did you all know Breitbart was a 2009 Claremont Institute Lincoln Fellow?
http://claremont.org/publications/pageid.2726/default.asp

Uncommon Knowledge With Andrew Breitbart - Hoover Institute Interview Video
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/03/uncommon-knowledge-with-andrew-breitbart.php

BREITBART'S GHOST
http://www.redstate.com/conservatoons/2012/03/02/breitbarts-ghost/


Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Right vs. Left, the Bottom Line


Earlier in the day, over at Obama's Facebook Wall, I posted a link to a very brief piece by Quinn Hillyer over at the American Spectator blog (Our Infanticidal President) where Hillyer, responding to Obama's rhetoric in defense of infanticide stresses and highlights that:
Obama was talking about children who the doctors had tried to abort, but who came out still alive and breathing, in the open air. Such children are not by any definition mere fetuses. They are children. Yet he would allow them to be killed, at least by deliberate neglect.
I have talked about this part of Obama's past before because it shows what a hardcore extremist this man really is. There is so much more in his background that needs to be known but the media doesn't like to report it.
 
In "light" of Obama's hardline stand against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act we shouldn't be surprised that he was trying to force every organization and group which employees people such as religious charities and education institutions to pay for abortifacients and contraceptives as if it was some kind of national emergency.
 
If the government can force us to buy contraceptives and abortifacients, as Obama and his regime claims, why not, as RUSH has argued, force people to buy toothbrushes?
 
What Obama has done is indefensible and its part of an extremist agenda that has been deceiving and destroying America. Yet we find ourselves arguing with people who defend this man or don't even the truth about him or any of these outrageous and tremendously incredible positions and calls which have been severely unAmerican and alarming.
 
Don't take my word for it and especially don't take Obama and the Democrats word for it. Just look around record numbers of unemployment record breaking levels of people taking food stamps. Gas prices way up. Yet no attempt is made to cut spending which is out of control.
 
As Bill Whittle has pointed out, Iraq and Afghanistan, plus other military costs and discretionary spending combine to make 18% of spending in total of what was spent in 2011. The rest of all the money was for everything else the government does. Most of the money is domestic spending and that's what needs to be cut because all the programs and benefits are the main reason for the debt. The rise of gas prices is like the rise in the price of precious metals such as gold, silver, and it will keep going up especially as the value of the dollar goes down.
 
This is how America is being destroyed through economic warfare. This is exactly what Columbia professors declared in the "Cloward-Piven" Strategy : to cause economic collapse and crisis in order to force everyone into a socialist/communist system. This program and agenda has been in play for a very long time. The Democratic Party has been the political front for this plan and the unions and immigrant rights issues are only the way in which the leaders of this manipulation get more votes to gain power in the courts and government agencies to achieve their goals.
 
Obama is one of these radicals and it takes a radical to know one and to expose and defeat one. That has to be us, people who care about the future of America and who really want to fix our problems instead of "transform" America into something which the constitution was written in order to protect us from. We have to understand what it means to be a radical and what it means to be on the left or on the right because they are not the same thing.
 
The left is defined by big government "socialist" economic views and the right is the opposition to such a thing. The right is more reliant on tradition and autonomy aka self-reliance. This is why it was such a BIG LIE to claim that Mussolini and Hitler were right wingers; Mussolini wanted the state to have final say and control over businesses and Nazi is short for the German Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei which stands for "National Socialist German Workers Party."
 
So what about the terms radical and conservative? A radical is a sort of rebel while a conservative is more of a person who wants to protect things as they are. For instance, a KGB agent in the totalitarian USSR would fit the description of conservative, but if this agent was on American soil he would be considered radical because the supreme law of the US frames and defines a system of limited government and free enterprise. That's the US constitution which defines a people who have a government in order that it doesn't become the other way around: a government which controls a people.

Monday, February 20, 2012

I posted this to Obamas facebook

Earlier today I posted this to Obama's facebook from a Tablet which was having issues and thought I should share it here also:  
hey Barack I like the way you got California to lower its education standards and pay more, have less of a say, and after this say, "thanks master, pllease let me have another" like a whipped , dependent and helpless sheeple.. How did u get California to give you its votes dude? Have you thanked the L.A. Times for hiding and keeping that video of yo and Rashid Khalidi from the public yet? Its in that 2008 article by Andrew C McCarthy. Just a mention. To everyone ese here : how about we CHANGE it back people! Change it all back and kick out the bums who do what they can to overthrow the American way openly defying the American constitution .and who put people in place and positions such as Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who actually recommend ed to another country that this American constitution which she swore an oath to uphold is no longer relevant or recommended in the world of 2012. because these people believe that the government should have more power and control over our lives . which our constitution was designed to prohibit. eople pay more for the "privilege" of such nonsensee. nmeanwhile the people are told that the government is not spending enough and other such nonsense ch as the idea that government creates jobs s and private enterprise causes poverty and unemployment! I think that is actually backwards and everyone knows it. But then gain what else do you expect except rising unemployment rising food stamp participation rising inflationary pressures throughout the economy and mediocre performance after agovernment and revolutionary political and academic hack Saul Alinsky army led by apresident who was raised by a communist mother, abandoned by a communist economist Kenyan father who wrote some book on "our socialism" and raised by a grandfather who took this president to be mentored by communist Alinskytype organizer/lawyer propagandist "uncle" Frank Marshall Davis.

See also:



AND ALSO The details and the parts of the story of the Palestinian Israeli conflict which you might not learn if you listen to Rashid Khalidi, Barack Obama (Look up the two names together plus Los Angeles Times*) and other extremists and shady characters:

(From 2008: The Los Angeles Times Suppresses Obama's Khalidi Tape by former federal prosecutor who got convictions against 1993 New York WTC bombers, ANDREW C. McCARTHY http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/226104/i-l-times-i-suppresses-obamas-khalidi-bash-tape/andrew-c-mccarthy)

Friday, February 3, 2012

State of the Union: A Conservative Response

Maybe we should try to understand our situation a little better.

Angelo Codevilla in his Claremont Review of Books essay, The Chosen One points out:

"...SINCE THE DAYS OF KARL MARX'S FIRST INTERNATIONAL A CENTURY AND A HALF AGO, THIS VERY HUMAN OPPOSITION BETWEEN SOCIALISTIC THEORY (EGALITARIANISM) AND SOCIALIST REALITY (OLIGARCHIC OPPRESSION) HAS BEDEVILED THE LEFT. Marx laid the problem bare in his "Critique of the Gotha Program" (1875). Lenin dealt with it honestly and brutally in What Is to Be Done? (1902)—the foundational document of Communism. By acknowledging that the Communist Party is not the common people's representative, but rather its "vanguard," Leninists were comfortable with a party responsible only to itself and to history, a party that openly demanded deference from the humans whose habits it forcibly reshaped. Communism's undeniable horrors forced the New Left to disassociate itself from What Is to Be Done? and once again to pretend that its socialism was neither oligarchic nor coercive, that somehow it was on the side of ordinary folks. This is a much tougher sell in the 21st century than it was in the 19th. Contemporary socialists try to explain away the common man's suspicion of them as harbingers of oligarchy, corruption, and coercion by resorting to jargon (e.g., "false consciousness" and "socio-economic anxiety"). But that is ever less convincing. THIS IS WHY THE MOVEMENT ARGUES SO STRENUOUSLY WITH ITSELF ABOUT WHETHER AND HOW MUCH IT SHOULD DISSIMULATE ITS AGENDA."
(The essay from which the above quote is taken discusses and analyzes Dreams from my Father by BARACK OBAMA; The Audacity of Hope by BARACK OBAMA; Radical-in-Chief by STANLEY KURTZ and other books which show Obama's extremist ties and ideologically Marxist pedigree and upbringing. It goes a long way towards understanding the mentality towards the American people and form of government which Barack Hussein Obama holds.)

This brings us to David Horowitz's Freedom Center pamphlet, Barack Obama's Rules For Revolution: THE ALINSKY MODEL...

This pamphlet gets into the "popular front" vs. the up-front revolutionary agenda of utopian hardliners and hacks such as Barack Obama. Understanding' Obama and the left's intellectual leaders and influences is key to understanding what is happening in America today.

Quoting from Horowitz:

My parents, who were card-carrying Communists, never referred to themselves as Communists but always as "progressives," as did their friends and political comrades. The "Progressive Party" was created by the Communist Party to challenge Harry Truman in the 1948 election because he opposed the spread of Stalin's empire. The Progressive Party was led by Roosevelt's vice president, HENRY WALLACE, and was the vehicle chosen by Communists to lead their followers out of the Democratic Party, which they had joined during the "popular front" of the 1930s. The progressives rejoined the Democrats during the McGovern campaign of 1972 and with the formation of a hundred-plus member Progressive Caucus in the congressional party and the ascension of Barack Obama to the presidency to become its most important political force.
As David Horowitz points out, "THERE'S NOTHING NEW ABOUT RADICALS CAMOUFLAGING THEIR AGENDAS AS MODERATE IN ORDER TO DISARM THEIR OPPOSITION [...] It was Lenin's idea too, from whom Alinsky appropriated it in the first place." (See Horowitz quoting p. 37 of Rules for Radials by Saul Alinsky)

It doesn't seem that there is enough education on what the Cold War, between the Soviet Union and the United States, Communism and Capitalism, was about. It is all very superficial and conveniently glossed over. No real general understanding about why and how limited government and economic freedom and liberty works and how Communism fails while violating the principles and rights which the American constitution is there to safeguard.

People don't really understand why some are so motivated and hellbent on the betrayal of America and liberty in the first place. This, too, must be explored and explained. It is not merely "esoteric discussion."

Why is America in such shambles today? Most Americans believed America to be this indestructable titan, and giant in science, progress and economics. Yet look around at the moral, economic, and spirtitual wasteland that is becoming more and more prevalent in this country.

There was a false sense of security because people had good reason to believe that no foe, no enemy could defeat and destroy America. Especially in a military confrontation. None really wanted to believe, to notice, or take seriously the threat and danger from within, which continues its war against America and her values. Yet, we see a more and more offensive and audacious army and network of organizations working (academically, politically, culturally) to push God away from America and the American mind while strengthening the powers of government and the would-be masterminds who know how to rule society and the economy better than the citizens themselves.   

People don't believe that some people would WANT to achieve this result, which America's enemies from abroad have called for, the destruction of America.  

They "can’t really want to destroy a society that is democratic and liberal, and more equal than other." Horowitz, and I, say "OH YES THEY CAN." You just have to put yourself in the Communist/Marxist and "we can't wait" mindframe:


There is no goodness that trumps the dream [and promise]of a heaven on earth. And because America is a real world society, managed by real and problematic human beings, it will never be equal, or liberal, or democratic enough to satisfy radical fantasies to compensate them for their longing for a perfect world [...] Compared to this heaven even America is hell.


So, having a better understanding of motive and of the "why" (the desire to achieve misguided utopian promises based on the myopic dogma of Karl Marx which the current president was fed by his Marxist mother Stanley Ann Dunn Ham to Frank M Davis and through his life as he self-reinforced this erronious and destructive point of view,) we can go back to examining the "how" of where America is today.
In pages 18 and 19 of Barack Obama's Rules For Revolution: The Alinsky Model we find that


While the Communist Left pretended to be Jeffersonian Democrats and "progressives" and formed "popular fronts" with liberals, the New Left radicals disdained these deceptions, REGARDING THEM AS A DISPLAY OF WEAKNESS [and inauthenticity.] To distinguish themselves from such popular front politics, sixties radicals said they were revolutionaries and proud of it.


New Left radicals despised and attacked liberals and created riots at the Democratic Party conventions. Their typical slogans were "Up againt the wall motherf-ker" and "Off the pig", telegraphing exactly how they felt [...] THE MOST BASIC PRINCIPLE OF ALINSKY'S ADVICE TO RADICALS IS TO LIE TO THEIR OPPONENTS AND DISARM THEM BY PRETENDING TO BE MODERATES AND LIBERALS.


Deception is the radical's most important weapon, and it has been a prominent one since the end of the sixties. Racial arsonists such as Al Sharpton and Jeremiah Wright pose as civil rights activists; anti-American radicals such as BILL AYERS pose as patriotic progressives; SOCIALISTS POSE AS LIBERALS. The mark of their success is reflected in the fact that conservatives collude in the deception and call them liberals as well.
Here's another key point:

CONSERVATIVES THINK OF WAR AS A METAPHOR WHEN APPLIED TO POLITICS. FOR RADICALS, THE WAR IS REAL. That is why when partisans of the left go into battle, they set out to destroy their opponents by stigmatizing them as "racists," "sexists," [...] It is also why they so often pretend to be what they are not ("liberals" for example) and rarely say what they mean. Deception for them is a military tactic in a war that is designed to eliminate the enemy. Alinsky's Rules for Radicals is first of all a comradely critique of the sixties' New Left. What bothers Alinsky about these radicals is their honesty - which may have been their only redeeming feature [...] THERE'S NOTHING NEW ABOUT RADICALS CAMOUFLAGING THEIR AGENDAS AS MODERATE IN ORDER TO DISARM THEIR OPPOSITION [...] It was Lenin's idea too, from whom Alinsky appropriated it in the first place.

Lenin is one of Alinsky's heroes (Castro is another). ALINSKY INVOKES LENIN IN THE COURSE OF CHIDING THE RHETORICAL RADICALS OVER A FAMOUS SIXTIES SLOGAN, which originated with the Chinese Communist dictator Mao Zedong. The slogan was "political power grows out of the barrel of a gun," and during the 1960s it was a favorite cry of the Black Panthers and other radical groups. Regarding this, Alinsky comments: "'Power comes out of the barrel of a gun' is an absurd rallying cry when the other side has all the guns. LENIN WAS A PRAGMATIST; WHEN HE RETURNED TO WHAT WAS THEN PETROGRAD FROM EXILE, HE SAID THAT THE BOLSHEVIKS STOOD FOR GETTING POWER THROUGH THE BALLOT BUT WOULD RECONSIDER AFTER THEY GOT THE GUNS." (Rules for Radicals, p. 37)

I'll leave it at that.

(P.S. If you would like to get copies of Barack Obama's Rules for Radicals: THE ALINSKY MODEL, they are available at the FrontPageMagazine.com BOOKSTORE for $3.00 a piece and $1 dollar a piece when purchasing 25 or more copies. Its is not the cheap kind of paper but of the high-quality waxy/glossy higher end stuff and a very handy size. Pass these around to friends and please share and link to this post if you found it useful. Thank you. )



Thursday, January 12, 2012

The American Social Compact Is Broken!



Only awareness about the truth of this situation will lead us out of this mess and undo much grave damage and roll back and finally defeat the dangerous and immensly destructive project of the bankrupt unsupportable socialist command-economy model which put the people of China, North Korea, Cuba and the former Soviet Republics under totalitarian bondage and civil, scientific, and economic, mediocrity. 

This awareness is necessary today so that history does not repeat itself and the greatest, most innovative, prosperous and truly progressive nation on earth perishes.

This is the wish of an American patriot in action and  friend to all who love liberty.