Mises and Madison

"With respect to the two words 'general welfare,' I have always regarded them as qualified by the DETAIL of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a METAMORPHOSIS of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." -April 20, 1831 Letter from James Madison (dubbed Father of the U.S. Constitution for his role in drafting of the text; see also The Federalist Papers, published on behalf of the American system as one of limited government of by and for the people of A Free Republic)~

"MODERN CRYPTODESPOTISM, which arrogates to itself the name of liberalism, finds fault with the negativity of the concept of freedom. The censure is spurious as it refers merely to the grammatical form of the idea and does not comprehend that all civil rights can be as well defined in affirmative as in negative terms. THEY ARE NEGATIVE AS THEY ARE DESIGNED TO OBVIATE AN EVIL, NAMELY THE OMNIPOTENCE OF THE POLICE POWER [OF GOVERNMENT], AND TO PREVENT THE STATE FROM BECOMING TOTALITARIAN." -Ludwig von Mises in chapter 21, The Theory of Money and Credit~

Prov. 11:3 - If the foundations be destroyed, what shall the righteous do?

Sunday, November 18, 2012

African Victim of Islamofascist Acid Attack Umar Mulinde on Experience With Islam


See also:


Post Election Reflections and The Voters That Stayed Home.. America Still Snoozing and Loosing

"About 11 million fewer Americans voted for the two major-party candidates in 2012 — 119 million, down from 130 million in 2008. In fact, even though our population has steadily increased in the last eight years (adding 16 million to the 2004 estimate of 293 million Americans), about 2 million fewer Americans pulled the lever for Obama and Romney than for George W. Bush and John Kerry."

-Andrew C. McCarthy in National Review

According to McCarthy, "the key to understanding the 2012 election is simple: A huge slice of the electorate stayed home."

"Obama lost an incredible 9 million voters from his 2008 haul. If told on Monday that fully 13 percent of the president’s support would vanish, the GOP establishment would have stocked up on champagne and confetti. To be sure, some of the Obama slide is attributable to “super-storm” Sandy. Its chaotic aftermath reduced turnout in a couple of big blue states: New York, where about 6 million people voted, and New Jersey, where 3.5 million did. That is down from 2008 by 15 and 12 percent, respectively. Yet, given that these solidly Obama states were not in play, and that — thanks to Chris Christie’s exuberance — our hyper-partisan president was made to look like a bipartisan healer, Sandy has to be considered a big net plus on Obama’s ledger. Put aside the fact that, as the election played out, Sandy was a critical boost for the president. Let’s pretend that it was just a vote drain — one that explains at least some of the slight drop in young voters. What did it really cost Obama? Maybe a million votes? It doesn’t come close to accounting for the cratering of his support. Even if he had lost only 8 million votes, that would still have been 11 percent of his 2008 vote haul gone poof. Romney should have won going away...For Americans who think elections can make a real difference, Tuesday pitted proud progressives against reticent progressives; slightly more preferred the true-believers. For Americans who don’t see much daylight between the two parties — one led by the president who keeps spending money we don’t have and the other by congressional Republicans who keep writing the checks and extending the credit line — voting wasn’t worth the effort. Those millions of Americans need a new choice. We all do."

I believe that Mr. McCarthy is off the mark here. I believe that the real key to the election results was culture, language and communication barriers, not whether or not people stayed home.

I still believe that Romeny was a very good candidate, far more reliable and qualified than Barack Obama. More people should have gone out to vote for Romney, but nevertheless that didn't happen and the rest is history.

Apparently the Hispanic vote increased for Obama while the White vote went down very significantly while the Black vote stayed about the same, more or less. Therefore the English language barrier may have played a role in this election as well due to the fact that the Republican party cannot communicate very effectively in Spanish and Ebonics. COMMUNICATION: Culture and language is probably the real key here.
And then of course there was the big Republican get-out-the-vote fail on the technological side of things.. See:

When the Nerds Go Marching In -ALEXIS MADRIGAL for The Atlantic: How a dream team of engineers from Facebook, Twitter, and Google built the software that drove Barack Obama's reelection [and how the Republican Orca get-out-the-vote program failed and crashed on election day] http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-the-nerds-go-marching-in/265325/

See also

Inside Orca: How the Romney Campaign Suppressed Its Own Vote

And then of course, how do you account for those who DID vote for Obama in 2012 ????

Economic Ignorance. Some quotes from NoPasaran!


"Anyone who says that economic security is a human right, has been too much babied. While he [urban man] battles [politically], other men are risking and losing their lives to protect him. They are [...] fighting the land, fighting diseases and insects and weather and space and time, for him, while he chatters that all men have a right to security in it some pagan God–Society, The State, The Government, The Commune—must give it to them. Let the fighting men stop fighting this in human Earth for one hour, and he will learn how much security there is."

"Affluent denizens of our metropolises see no inconsistency in supporting the Democratic jihad against “greedy corporations” and “the rich” while also expecting their every whim to be supplied, often by those same corporations and successful entrepreneurs. This is because they are removed from some of the harsher daily realities of life that confront those who are on the front lines of mankind’s ongoing economic struggle. They have forgotten that mankind’s natural state is poverty and that strenuous, heroic efforts are required to produce the astounding affluence and abundant paraphernalia of our modern, affluent lifestyles... Like the ivory-tower academics who enthuse about socialism because they have never experienced the harsh realities of socialism, so today, many denizens of our big cities are afflicted with a “metropolitan blind spot” that causes them to support irrational, ultimately self-destructive policies. In their urban cocoons, city-dwellers take for granted the abundance and availability of the economic goods that they consume..."

Sunday, November 4, 2012

A SEUSSian cartoon explains America's economic crisis/socialism

American Enterprise Institute/AEITV:

Glenn Beck calls out libs/Leftist TV media for mocking emergency preparedness


GLEN was right COLBERT was WRONG.

Culture and Survival of the American Constitution by Thomas Brewton


"...Opposing our original conception of government is the liberal jihad, driven by the ideology of socialism, sometimes called The Religion of Humanity or secular humanism. This religion was formalized in the 1789 French Revolution, the same year that our Constitution was ratified.

"Socialism is a secular religion. Like Islamic suicide bombers, liberals are so firmly persuaded that their cause is right, good, and just that they are prepared to go to any lengths necessary to destroy the Judeo-Christian ethic of individual morality and replace it with a rigidly regulated National-State collectivism, of which Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were extreme examples.

"The religion of socialism is being taught unconstitutionally, at your expense, in public schools and colleges receiving Federal aid. Teaching the religious doctrine of socialism as “scientific fact” amounts to making liberal-progressive-socialism the unconstitutionally established religion of the United States. The way, and it necessarily will be laborious, to stop the liberal jihad is to force schools to present both sides of the story, traditionalist, as well as liberal-progressive.

"Publicly funded schools now teach only the amoral, secular materialism of the socialist religion. Schools no longer present true versions of American history and of our original ideas of civic virtue and personal morality that are historically the substance of Western civilization. Penetrating the shield of socialist teachers’ unions and the politicians whom they help elect is a very long-term project, but a vital one.

"The largest volume of immigration in the nation’s history, both legal and illegal, coupled with liberals’ relentless efforts to destroy America’s original traditions of individual morality, leaves us with no core values and a diminishing will to defend ourselves against foreign enemies."



UPDATE: (SEE ALSO: OLD SCHOOL - Bill Whittle visits Oberlin College Ohio)

Sunday, October 28, 2012

The Media and Benghazi

"Sandra Fluke and Trayvon Martin were important to @ABC @CBS @NBC @CNN @ABC @MSNBC, but the deaths and treachery in Benghazi are no big deal" -@MarshallFSmith
UPDATE (11-04-2012)

Lt. Col. And Special Ops Planner Calls Rush: “White House Can’t Deny Obama Knew About Benghazi Attack Immediately”

Lt. Col. And Special Ops Planner Calls Rush: “White House Can’t Deny Obama Knew About Benghazi Attack Immediately”

 These brave Americans fought for their lives against America's most bitter enemies, called for help and were left to perish.. meanwhile the P.O.S. in Chief sat on his hands and then tried to cover up what happened.
"Let’s also remember that, although Obama decided to approve the raid that killed bin Laden, his team apparently considered this (and his campaign has promoted it as) a difficult decision. Bill Clinton and Joe Biden praise Obama’s alleged courage on this occasion, pointing to the adverse consequences to Obama of a failed mission against bin Laden.
"If the decision to kill an unsuspecting and poorly defended bin Laden – America’s enemy number 1 for a decade – was difficult for the Obama administration to make, then the odds were always against a decision to fly our military blind into harm’s way in Benghazi in response to situation whose precise contours weren’t well known. Obama’s decision not to intervene was likely less about “the fog of war” than about fear of the fog of war. "


Sunday, October 21, 2012

Agenda For Freedom 2012

(...A list of demands)

{I - Restoration of the U.S. Constitution}

At every level, government has exceeded its bounds. It has taxed, spent and regulated the American people without restraint or limitation. It verges on tyranny as it confiscates our wealth, repudiates the free market and intrudes into every aspect of our lives. It violates our American principles of freedom, personal responsibility and limited government.

We therefore reaffirm the First Principles of the American Revolution and demand the immediate restoration of limited, Constitutional government.

{II - The Government Class}

The last century witnessed the rise of a new and privileged class in America: The Government Class. It is an insidious alliance of elected officials, bureaucrats and special interests who receive the largess of government and profit from its decrees. This parasitical class has risen not on its merits but on its influence. It rules by decree instead of the consent of the governed. It arrogantly claims the right to seize and redistribute the wealth of private, productive American citizens. They grant themselves extravagant salaries, benefits, pensions and privileges of which others can only dream. Unlike the average American whose future depends upon a healthy market economy, the Government Class invests only in itself and relies only upon its power to coerce. So privileges is this new aristocracy that its gold-plated pensions remain fully intact while private pensions have lost over $2 trillion in value. The rise of this rapacious new class corresponds directly to the decline of our economic power and the erosion of constitutionally guaranteed liberties. As such it is completely counter to the First Principles and ideals of the American Revolution.

We therefore demand that our representatives serve without pay or emolument; that collective bargaining be abolished for government employees; that the civil service system be reformed; and, excepting the armed forces, that no government entity shall provide or guarantee a pension benefit for any person or institution.


Treating our property as its own, the Government Class has paved The Road to Serfdom with our money.

It acknowledges no moral or constitutional limit on its power to tax the wealth of Americans and use it as it pleases. It taxes so that it may spend. It spends so that it may control. It purchases the vote of one American by promising him the property of another.

IT sustains its power and prerogatives by an oppressive and Byzantine system of taxation that is in itself the chief obstacle to economic growth and recovery. Such a system is utterly incompatible with our right to be secure in our property and thereby violates the First Principles of the American Revolution.

We therefore demand the adoption of a simplified State and Federal flat tax system that substantially reduces taxation and ensures that the burden is shared BY ALL AMERICANS.


The Government Class uses the school system to usurp the natural and inalienable right of parents to educate their children.

Under the guise of multiculturalism and a false tolerance, it relentlessly and insidiously undermines American traditions and Judeo-Christian values.

The government seeks not to educate a free citizenry but to control it. It cynically calculates that a child who lives in government housing, who rides to school on a government bus, who eats in a government cafeteria, who is taught by a government approved teacher using only government approved boosk containing government approved ideas, will not question that government as an adult.

Free from competition and corrupted by unionism, the public school system is the most expensive and least efficient institution in our society.

There is little doubt that if our inner city schools were a publicly funded private enterprise, it would long ago have been shut down and its operators put in jail. This system is utterly incompatible with our rights of Free Speech, Free Association and Freedom of Religion and is by reason thereof, the chief impediment ot the restoration of the Republic.

We therefore demand that the government monopoly in education be abolished and replaced by system of tax credits and vouchers so that parents may send their children to a private or public school of their choice.


The Government Class has employed a false environmentalism in a naked assault on private property, on the free enterprise system and on any notion of Constitutional, limited government.

Advancing speculative, pseudo-scientific theories of climate change and global warming, they seek control over every aspect of the American economy. They refuse to develop our ample energy resources.

Already straining under the crushing weight of debt, spending, taxation and regulation, they now seek to heap upon us an even heavier burden of "Cap and Trade."

Even more destructive than the current system, these new proposals will devastate the American economy, weaken our defenses, strengthen our enemies and spread economic and political chaos throughout the world.

As with the Great Depression, war may well come in its wake.

We therefore demand that our government abandon its destructive environmental policies, curb the EPA and forthwith fully develop our energy resources. They must immediately lift all bans on oil drilling and fast track the construction of nuclear power plants, issue permits for clean coal facilities, build new refineries and, most importantly, radically limit the jurisdiction and power of the courts to make environmental policy.


Not content with destroying our industries, a voracious Government Class has moved with frightening speed to nationalize the American healthcare system.

Now seeking control over our very lives, it presents itself as the solution to crisis of its own making.

The same people who reject the death penalty will now decide who receives treatment and, therefore, who lives and who dies. The same government that has bankrupted Social Security and presided over the collapse of the financial system now insists it can provide healthcare to more people, more efficiently than the free market.

This is a monstrous lie. Like Socialism itself, socialized medicine has failed everywhere it has been tried. More importantly, socialized medicine grossly violates the letter and spirit of the Constitution and must be rejected entirely.

We therefore demand that the government withdraw from this dangerous course. Instead we urge legal, tax and regulatory reforms that will enable doctors, patients, employers and insurers to work within the free market to develop healthcare solutions without the intrusion of government.


The modern welfare state has spent itself into oblivion and is now collapsing of its own weight.

The Government Class has eagerly embraced every failed socialist fantasy in the dustbin of history. In its lust for power, it has promised everything to everyone.

It has shredded the constitution, made a mockery of federalism, savaged the economy and poised this country on the brink of bankruptcy.

It treats our property and income as its own. What it cannot tax, it takes. When it can no longer spend, it borrows. When it can do neither, it mandates. It sweeps away everything in its path and with our inalienable rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

We therefore demand that the government cease the redistribution of property, that the modern welfare state be dismantled and that the government spending be confined to the narrow, limited purposes sanctioned by the Constitution.


In the last 70 years an unrestrained Government Class has incurred a national debt that now exceeds $10 TRILLION dollars.

The unfunded liabilities of Social Security and Medicare alone will exceed $50 TRILLION. To fund this debt they have chosen to inflate our money supply which will debase our currency, steal from our creditors and drive up interest rates for public and private borrowers alike. Worse yet, this debt will not be repaid by this generation or even the next.

Instead, millions of unborn Americans will have to shoulder a debt they neither created nor approved. This unconscionable intergenerational theft violates the First Principles of the American Revolution: No taxation without representation.

We therefore demand that Government radically reduce its size and scope; cease deficit spending except in time of war; end inflation; and aggressively reduce our national debt!

{written by Michael T. Alexander, TEAPAC.net}

Monday, August 13, 2012

On the Obamacare threat

Under capitalism government is a necessary evil, the people view bureaucrats and politicians as public servants - and the fewer of them there are the better.

Under socialism the people view bureaucrats and politicians as their commanders. And to the demanders, the more government authority and power, the better.
As George Washington said, "Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
Paul Ryan on the Obamacare threat:

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Yes we have to fight Communism... Again. Or Socialism whatever you want to call the statist flavor of the month.

Exploring the philosophy and agenda of occupawn socialists to overthrow the American form of government and economy and the Democrats who applauded and supported them i.e. Obama, Pelosi et al:

See also THE FUTURE OF LIBERTY by George Reisman, PhD

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Obamacare by rule of LIE, not rule of law. 06/28/2012

Chief Justice Roberts transformed Obamacare into a tax to save Obamacare instead of throwing it out as unconstitutional. when Obama had said the individual mandate is "ABSOLUTELY NOT A TAX" - and Judge Roberts said, uhh, dude, yeah it IS A TAX.

Judge Napolitano is right, this is such a bizarre taxation on our actions/inactions as individuals, I believe in order for it to be constitutional it should require an amendment to the US Constituion in order to make it legal, just like the income tax.

In his ruling Roberts basically argued that Congress has the unlimited ability to tax and spend. Sounds like a lefty lib judge to me if you want my opinion.

Justice Kennedy was right in this one ...this law should have been thrown out in its entirety and Congress and the president should have written a constitutional law! Thats HIS job and thats CONGRESSES job isnt it? That's the way it's supposed to work.
What the heck is this Roberts?

I knew something was off when thy rules that States do not have the power to regulate who goes into their boundaries legally or illegally. WTF America do you have a constitution anymore or are we going to be ruled by liberal lawyers who want to ban the ten commandments, God and the constitution itself?
Remember, this is the same week the USSC ruled that States don't have a right to enforce their own laws when those laws are even in compliance with federal law that the federal government has chosen not to enforce. Republicans, the Tea Party, Conservative intellectuals, activists, and veterans have a real uphill battle here. A good start would be by ensuring no more liberal sleepers get into the Supreme Court such as Bush's Roberts and Reagan's Oconner. Its going to get time to get this country back to the rule of law.

Saturday, June 23, 2012

The Wide Gunwalker Difference

Question of the day:

" So, what was the purpose of Fast and Furious if the weapons were not tracked, no cooperation between US and Mexican authorities went on and no arrests were made? "

A little more background:

Fast and Furious Coverup: Obama Asserts Executive Privilege to Protect Himself
Holder Just Us Dept: The Crimes are Worse than the Coverup
Holder Retracts Lie that Bush's Attorney General Knew About Gunwalking

Obama's Claim of Executive Privilege: It's Frivolous (John Hinderaker, Powerline)

The Purpose of Fast and Furious???

Those Fast and Furious Documents Must Be Dynamite (Paul Mirengoff, Powerline)

I haven't been posting in a while, I know, just taking care of some things that need tending to. I will probably be blogging much less and doing less analytical posts and just sharing stuff here, on twitter, free republic, and facebook from time to time for the next few months.

Thanks for your patience and support friends!

...We need to defeat the seditious organized extremist movement behind this so-called American president and getting him out of the White House. He is not the first and he will not be the last as this has been an ongoing and worstening threat to America for several decades, going back to all those politicians and intellectuals who believe that America is "fundamentally flawed" and that replacing her with something else more malleable and ideologically politically correct by whatever means should be the goal of their work and actions.

Exposing and understanding who they are and what they are up to is just 90% of the battle.

On the bright side, the influence and pervasiveness of this institutionally corrupting and destructive movement may have reached its peak, despite and in spite of the role played by a compliant and collaborating media and education system.

The good news is that in my observation more and more people are connecting the dots and looking through the smokescreen, and peaking behind the curtain of what I call LIE-beralism which is all specious argumentation, pretense, and flat out lies in some very big cases. It has gotten more and more desparate, aggressive and blatant by the day.

America is fundamentally NOT socialist and Socialist/Communist/Marxist ideology requires and demands coercion for its existence. It lives and breathes manipulation.

Mark Levin and David Horowitz, two very influencial intellectual giants and activists in the Conservative movement, have argued that the difficulty with understanding the motive for sedition and treason as well as everything else that goes with it, is that in the name of the utopian vision and promise, almost any act is justified. Thats it, thats the bottom line.

They are a product of Marxist blame-America-first conditioning and "education" and now we are witnessing the fruits of their labors in the highest office of the land.

No, Madison Wisconsin was not the first "Occupy" and neither were the Vietnam War protests. The first hints or first leftwing "Occupy" and takeover of America's institutions in my view is hinted at in William F. Buckley Jr.'s God & Man at Yale, published around 1951 or 52. Also, C.S. Lewis makes observations in The Abolition of Man, published in the early 1940s I believe.

So what is the American Conservative movement and agenda all about? It is a rebirth of America's founding Judeo-Christian values and political philosophy. That of limited government and entrepreneurial liberal capitalist free market economy.

The difference between that and the "Liberal" left agenda and program in America and the world (I believe Prager writes about it in Still the Best Hope: why the world needs American values to triumpth) is very wide indeed.

And by their fruits ye shall know them.


Wow, just found this one:

Fast and Furious: Follow the Ideology!

Saturday, June 2, 2012

Bill Clinton defends Mitt Romney's "Sterling business career" against Obama..

Seems like Clinton wants to get Democrats away from Marxist and anti-free market economy rhetoric and policies.

Who knows with that Saul Alinsky follower wife of his!?

Great analysis and brief background of the situation and motivation by John Hinderaker over at PowerLine blog:


"By the end of the Carter administration, the Democratic Party was discredited not only in foreign policy, but as a steward of the economy. The success of the Reagan administration, following upon Carter’s failure, seemed to assure the supremacy of free market principles.

"It took Bill Clinton to restore credibility to the Democrats, and to make it safe for businessmen to be Democrats again, by moving the Democrats back toward the center on economic issues. Clinton’s partnership with Robert Rubin made the Democrats the party of finance. For a time, it seemed that Democratic centrism on economic issues was not a mirage.

"But then the financial collapse struck and Barack Obama had the presidency essentially handed to him on a platter. It quickly became clear that troglodyte Democrats had never gone away; they had just been in eclipse [laboring and lying in wait?] for a while. Now in control of both Congress and the White House, Democrats who opposed free enterprise (but cloaked their antagonism toward free markets in anti-Wall Street rhetoric) became ascendant.

"Old-fashioned economic know-nothingism came, once again, to dominate the Democratic Party. The stagnation of the last three years has been one result."

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Of Pinterest

Somehow, with all that's going on in the world (or just in mine) today, I found time to get on Pinterest! Looks interesting. .

I've posted a couple of cool pictures and videos, including short home-video clips that I wanted to share.

UPDATE: See also here


Definitely another place where I can share my entrepreneurial spirit and educational pro-American constitution and free enterprise entrepreneurial system ideas with even more people. Gotta love this internet thing that Al Gore created LOL.


Sunday, May 13, 2012

Happy Mother's Day! Its a Beautiful Bountiful World!

HAPPY MOTHERS DAY TO ALL THE MOTHERS OF THIS WORLD. I BRING GOOD NEWS FOR YOU and more evidence that Communist Socialist manipulators who hide behind "environmentalist" and "progressive" lables want people to believe that we are running out of everything so that we give up our freedom and let the government limit our wealth and our industious developments. (Thats the bad news)

The truth is we need more entrepreneurship and a better appreciation and understanding about the fundamentals of business and economics, not bigger and bigger government which encroaches on liberty and limits our capabilities while it makes promises that it cannot keep and which it is not the role of the government to be making. Human beings and their economy and spirit are very resilient and can recover very well from bad times and experiences and failures. (The good news)

In India "Warehouses are overflowing and huge quantities of wheat and rice [...] millions of tons of wheat rotting because India ran out of warehouse space to hold another bumper crop" Steven Hayward asks: "REMEMBER HOW PAUL EHRLICH WAY BACK WHEN HE SAID FOOD PRODUCTION WOULD NEVER CATCH UP WITH POPULATION GROWTH, THAT INDIA WAS DOOMED, ETC, ETC? (Lester Brown still says this every other week.)"

(From "Paul Ehrlich Was Unavailable For Comment" by Steven Hawyard http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/05/paul-ehrlich-was-unavailable-for-comment.php)
Meanwhile, America is "Swimming in Oil" which we have not been allowed to access FOR NO GOOD REASON!

"America has more fossil fuel resources than any other nation. Russia is second, Saudi Arabia is third."

Just last Thursday "a representative of the Government Accountability Office testified before [Congress] that the Green River Formation alone [...] at the intersection of the states of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, and mostly underlies federal lands–CONTAINS AS MUCH OIL AS THE ENTIRE PROVEN RESERVES OF THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED"!!!

Will the LIE-beral Marxist control freaks "block the development of the resources that can assure America’s economic supremacy for generations?"

(From We Are Swimming in Oil by John Hinderaker http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/05/we-are-swimming-in-oil.php)

Tim Dunn and expert in the field and the CEO of Crown Quest Operating and a member of the Texas Public Policy Foundation writes:

"The Ghawar field in Saudi Arabia is probably the most prolific oil field in the world. When I worked on the field in 1979 as a young Exxon engineer fresh out of college, it produced around seven million barrels per day out of only a couple hundred wells.

"The enormous coral complex buried almost two miles under ground that contains the oil is so large it creates a hill on the surface...

"In time smaller, more difficult to produce fields get found. Since the oil industry as we know it was largely invented by Americans, the United States was developed preferentially.

"The US currently produces less than ten percent of the world’s daily oil production but STILL RUNS HALF THE WORLD'S DRILLING RIGS. Oil production peaked in the US in the early 1970’s and declined until just recently.

"In my last post I mentioned that an American’s daily need for 2200 Calories from food is equaled by only four 13 ounce bottles of oil, and each bottle would only cost about a quarter. But only a few years ago it was less than a dime per bottle. I think this Peak Oil theory is accurate when applied to the easy-to-access oil the industry focused on until recently.

"BUT ONCE THE PRICE WENT FROM TEN CENTS PER 'COKE CAN' TO TWENTY FIVE CENTS OIL ENTREPRENEURS WENT TO WORK. In Canada, they started accessing oil so heavy it won’t flow. It requires steam heating and processing before it is useful. At the higher price of twenty five cents per 'coke can' that is now profitable. Canada comes just after Saudi Arabia in oil reserves; they just aren’t the easy-to-access sort.

"I spoke with a guy developing some of these Canadian reserves. He told me they spent a hundred and fifty million dollars building a road just to get trucks and equipment to an oil field. But at the higher price for oil, entrepreneurs find a way and paying the cost of access is part of it.
"Canadian oil producers now expect production to double in the next fifteen years.

"Higher prices make it worthwhile to pay the additional cost to recover oil supplies that aren’t more easily accessed like the oil at the 'conventional' Ghawar Field.

"By the way, since the Obama Administration killed the Keystone Pipeline, Canada will sell their oil to Asia. http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/04/03/china-canada-oil-and-obama/

"So our Energy-crats spurned nearby oil supplies from friendly, politically stable Canada in favor of imports from… Venezuela. Want to turn over more decisions about our economy’s 'food supply' to the Energy-crats?

"We all prefer cheap prices, but the recent price increase will be a part of ensuring ample supplies of this miracle fuel, that even at the higher price of twenty five cents per 'coke can' costs less than half the price of a comparable amount of carbonated sugar water. Natural gas supplies are now seemingly endless, and if you owned a compressed natural gas car you would be driving for the gasoline equivalent of forty cents per gallon (before taxes.) But first natural gas prices went from $2 to $8.

"And in fact, something similar is happening in the US oil sector. More on that in the next Post."
(From Oil-Haters and Energy-crats by Tim Dunn, posted by Hugh Hewitt. More here http://www.hughhewitt.com/blog/g/e1ca80e6-ea62-4097-84bc-155e9b5a4bbb)

-Chris, Free Market Circle, Patriots in Action Los Angeles


Saturday, April 28, 2012

What we need right now

WE NEED A CAPITALIST REVOLUTION. A revolution of ideas which will empower us, encourage excellence, and build wealth. It is not about "spreading wealth" its about building wealth. Many of our so-called leaders are fostering government dependency and mediocrity rather than independence and excellence. Obama probably wishes he could understand what makes a corporation or company work in real life so instead of learning about it he is treating taxpayers money like his investment/capital/retained earnings account but its just his friends getting rich (George Soros, Warren Buffet etc) while everyone else is getting poor. Its a revolution and plunder agenda. Its not about promises, promises are for con-men and manipulative characters. PROFIT is not a dirty word, everything we do is to profit us somehow! Money is a tool but it gets lost and wasted in the hands of fools. It is the spirit of entrepreneurship, virtue and excellence which helps us reach our goals. That and long term thinking. It is the crisis and hasty action model which gets people to play into the hands of manipulators and would-be dictators to gain power and do their "work." Liberty is a cornucopia it can't be "directed" or rationed in the name of prosperity. The Karl Marx "spread the wealth" worldview/attitude and doctrine has only spread more poverty and misery. It is folly and nonsense to argue and really believe that this is STRICTLY a world of haves and have nots, because there are categories in between. This argument didn't take into account the fact that people usually move upward, more and more towards the "haves" category so the "class war" is myopic and divisive nonsense. One might even consider it a form of conditioning and brainwashing which fosters dependence and excuses. In other words: mediocrity, resentment, and negativity with all that follows along with economic ignorance and lack of appreciation for the creative forces of a free market and truly enlightened, creative, productive and educated entrepreneurial people.

Monday, April 23, 2012


This video has to go viral, it was released by FreeMarketAmerica.org which itself was just launched on Friday 04/20/2012. A friend sent me a link to the video which I'm sharing here.


This group actually started from two other organizations, which are "Free Market Florida," If I'm not mistaken, and "Americans For Limited government" which have joined together as I intend to do also.

Obviously, I am also doing outreach communications and analysis along the lines of what this video attempts to speak against as well as speak for! I am working in my own presentation as do many many more Americans because we are in the late stages of a Fabian, Menshevik, Gramscian, LIEberal socialist revolution it is moving us more and more towards the fascist corporatist state control model where "the commerce clause" of the US constitution authorizes the government to takeover anything any industry and control of what you may or may not purchase because they are arguing that x,y, or z economic activity or non-activity impacts the whole nation. Well, all economic activity impacts the nation!

They are doing this and more! They've gotten this far with mendacious characters like Obama and many others.

Sociology professors Francis Fox Piven and her husband Cloward authored the Cloward Piven strategy in the 1960s or 70s which was designed to make the American economy the free market capitalist system collapse and thus create a crisis which these "progressives" could usher in more government control over our lives.

As they have been engaged in this project they have also followed professor Saul Alinsky's gangster/power relations model where their main opponent is a democratic republic and it's constitution and as the constitutionally weaker yet typically very wealthy party they must impose their agenda on America and her people through quite socialist means which if we look closely involves revolution and plunder following the ENRON accounting SCAN AND SHAM model.

And I'll have much more on this! Material and evidence.

I have not posted for a pretty long time as I have had to take are of many commitments, so I appreciate everyone's patience. Thank you.

I'm actually posting this from a phone and I have to run!

-the management/defendit aka chris

If the argument is that congress
or obama (neither of which have kept their promises already in severL related respects) has the power to mandate individuals to participate in commerce by forcing individuals across the nation to purchase x,y, or z, in the name of healthcare reform then they have removed a very important check on the authority of federal govt which they have no authority to do under the constitution which they swore to uphold. That's it, end of issue on Obamacare. At least it's supposed to be.

Yet we are I the situation we are in because we are dealing with committed Marxists, Utopianis, and widespread economic ignorance. This is why it is time to start thinking about capitalism and true empowerment entrepreneurship, enlightenment, outreach, training and communication.

Most Americans don't vote they see t as just two idiots arguing with eachother and business as usual. If they see what is happening and we expose the Marxist agenda and make the contrast and case for capitalism in a real and effective way, then we may improve our economic situation and chances for progress and prosperity again.

The presidential and general elections of 2012 are just the beginning for us and those just joining and becoming aware of what is going on here: the battle between those who believe in "transforming" America into something fundamentally her opposite and those of us calling for revolution against their ideology and agenda.

Obama and his "carefully chosen" Marxist and agitated radical often anti-American friends reminds me of the carnival conman in pinnochio who promised fun and games, happy days ahead: little did the young gullible children know they would become donkeys and be worked and ridden like asses.

As I said above, Its a major sham and scam/deception model/operation which parallels and continues from Enron, Lay, Gore, KRUGMAn; Fannie Freddie Funkyness; Cloward Piven; NY Times Walter Duranty; Reverse Perestroika, Jon Corzine, MF Global; Warren Buffet and his Nebraska owned railway project and interests groups opposed to TransCanada pipeline; Jamie Gorelick (see "crime punished and unpunished" on powerlineblog + "investigate this!" By Ann Coulter ) and on and on...

They are engaged in an epic Revolution and plunder campaign, again it's Cloward-Piven with a dash of Saul Alinsky Chicago-gangster emulating politicos who have gotten away with so much already they feel invincible. Stopping them in 2012 is just the first step in straightening things out and saving America from their reverse-Bizarro version Glasnost Perestroika and reverse-Reagan Marxist international agenda.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

+Save Capitalism, Save America+

In Seven Things I Learned About Transition From Communism, Russian-born Harvard economics professor Andrei Shleifer pointed out that "recovery and rapid growth occured nearly everywhere" after temporary declines as Russia and the Soviet states transitioned -or to use a recently more fashionable term, "transformed" - their economies to more capitalistic ones. And, yes, "economic transformation takes time." Nothing too shattering or surprising really. Read the whole thing if you like. Its just a click away at the hyperlink in the first sentence here.

There are some people who would argue for (and some of them working towards) going in the opposite direction despite its expected ruinous and tyrannical effects on everyone upon who this mad experiment and ideology is imposed.

Transitioning or "transforming" TO Communism away from Capitalism means increased poverty, misery and authoritarianism. This is because, as Adam Smith so astutely emphasized, "the property which every man has in his own labour, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable." 

I'de like to share a quote from Mark Levin's Ameritopia here, to further explain the situation:
As Karl Popper noted, Vladimir "Lenin was quick to realize [that] Marxism was unable to help in practical economics. 'I do not know of any socialist who has dealt with these problems... there was nothing written about such matters in Bolshevik textbooks or in those of the Mensheviks.'
As Lenin admits, 'there is hardly a word on the economics of socialism to be found in Marx's work...'
Man's nature and history are not neatly defined through economic classes, whose members are easily categorized. To say that man exists in essentially one of two economic conditions - a bourgeois or capitalist/landlord class or a proletariat or working class, with the former perpetually exploiting the latter and the latter perpetually exploited by the former - is simply erroneous.
The likelihood of [Communism's] ruling proletariat might break into factions and internal power struggles, with would-be masterminds competing for control over the society; or that once in position to exercise absolute power a dictator or supreme party would voluntarily surrender their power and wither away [when it was theoretically time for the classless utopia to grow out of all this hypothetically brilliant socialism] are not even addressed in the Communist Manifesto. To have done so, however, would have required Marx and Engels to [...] acknowledge the hopelessness of their utopia [...] Notwithstanding one hundred years of communist tyranny and mass genocide, the fanatics cling to their utopia.
See also 

-THE FUTURE OF LIBERTY by George Reisman

R.I.P. Andrew Breitbart

With a terrible feeling of pain and loss we announce the passing of Andrew Breitbart.

Andrew passed away unexpectedly from natural causes shortly after midnight this morning in Los Angeles.

We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior.

Andrew lived boldly, so that we more timid souls would dare to live freely and fully, and fight for the fragile liberty he showed us how to love.

Andrew recently wrote a new conclusion to his book, Righteous Indignation:
I love my job. I love fighting for what I believe in. I love having fun while doing it. I love reporting stories that the Complex refuses to report. I love fighting back, I love finding allies, and—famously—I enjoy making enemies.
THREE YEARS AGO, I WAS MOSTLY A BEHIND-THE-SCENES GUY WHO LINKED STUFF ON A VERY POPULAR WEBSITE.  I ALWAYS WONDERED WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE TO ENTER THE PUBLIC REALM TO FIGHT FOR WHAT I BELIEVE IN. I’ve lost friends, perhaps dozens. But I’ve gained hundreds, thousands—who knows?—of allies. At the end of the day, I can look at myself in the mirror, and I sleep very well at night.
Andrew is at rest, yet the happy warrior lives on, in each of us
What Andrew learned, and what he demonstrated through his actions, is that it takes a radical to beat a radical.  As I said before, in Left vs. Right, the Bottom Line , it takes a radical to know one and to expose one and defeat one.

There are the big government Socialist/Marxist/Communist radicals, and then there are those like Andrew Breitbart and Glenn Beck, and Sarah Palin, who are against big government and they are for the American Constitution of limited government and who rely more on tradition and their own ideas and labors when it comes to their personal lives, their mission, and their politics.

What sets Breitbart and Palin and others such as Allen West and Herman Cain as well as many others, and Ron Paul, as misguided as he is about defense and who's fault it is for the hate that exists in the Mideast, is that they are all in the fight and they have stood against liars and cheats and coercive radical revolutionaries and it really has taken all of their effort and focus to do so. They took the extra steps and went the extra mile. Because they understand what is going on and what is at stake. They understand that we are in a non-kinetic civil war, and what appears to be the LATE stages of a socialist revolution and the destruction of America from within which has been in the works while the ideas behind it are nothing new and have been refuted.

The task at hand is to show this, and to share it wide and far. And it is really a fight, because there are those who do not wish the truth to be known. So one must really stand up to them, their manipulations, interests and power. And remember Saul Alinsky taught them how to gain power to achieve their utopian fundamentally unAmerican extremist agenda. Breitbarthas demonstrated to and shown many how to fight back. God rest his soul now.

Here's Andrew at his last Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC 2012): 

And the next video which follows reveals how he stood up for the silent majority of Americans who believe in the American constitution and who see how people have been manipulated by socialist and communist radicals who have been trying to "transform" America into exactly what the constitution was written to protect us all from.

This next video shows how the Saul Alinsky "community organizer"/socialist astroturf program works..

Notice the organizers didn't want their followers to talk to Breitbart so they would remain ignorant and see how they are manipulated. It was obviously a union "workers of the world unite" protest (probably SEIU) except they didn't wear their union stuff. They could not answer Breitbart's arguments or his questions about what is going on and what he and Glenn Beck are trying to tell them.

It is really a microcosm of what Andrw was trying to do in Los Angeles and across the country, especially in "Blue" and leftist radical dominated areas which is to inform those who need to know, those who would wake up once the people misguiding them were exposed for what they were really up to. It is going to take getting into the belly of the beast and exposing the left's shout-you-down false narrative and controlling tactics. Especially when it comes to the campuses which need to be liberated from counterproductive and useless LIE-beral blame-America first Marxist revolutionary radicalizing indocrtination/brainwashing factories from where all this nonsense -and more-  originates.

It is going to take an Army of Breitbarts, or Davids, so to speak, to do this. 
As one writer famously stated, in an age of universal deception it becomes revolutionary to tell the truth.

Rest in peace Andrew Breitbart, you will be sorely missed. From the bottom of my heart, thank you so much for your service to your country.

In your honor, here at Free Market American/Free Market Circle, and everyone in the American Conservative/Tea party we are all patriot radicals today.

And until America's constitutional order is restored and followed by our so-called political leaders, judges, and government officials who openly defy the supreme law of the land by which they claim the very positions and authority they hold and OCCUPY.


((in - memorium ~ guisto solegno))






LINK/PJTV REMEMBERS A TRUE PATRIOT. Bill Whittle, Roger L. Simon, Lionel Chetwynd, Stephen Kruiser on the impact of Andrew Breitbart

LINK/Bill Whittle: My Friend Andrew


LINK/Andrew Breitbart RIP -Richard Brookhiser 

Robert Stacy McCain: The Breitbart Experience

Did you all know Breitbart was a 2009 Claremont Institute Lincoln Fellow?

Uncommon Knowledge With Andrew Breitbart - Hoover Institute Interview Video


Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Right vs. Left, the Bottom Line

Earlier in the day, over at Obama's Facebook Wall, I posted a link to a very brief piece by Quinn Hillyer over at the American Spectator blog (Our Infanticidal President) where Hillyer, responding to Obama's rhetoric in defense of infanticide stresses and highlights that:
Obama was talking about children who the doctors had tried to abort, but who came out still alive and breathing, in the open air. Such children are not by any definition mere fetuses. They are children. Yet he would allow them to be killed, at least by deliberate neglect.
I have talked about this part of Obama's past before because it shows what a hardcore extremist this man really is. There is so much more in his background that needs to be known but the media doesn't like to report it.
In "light" of Obama's hardline stand against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act we shouldn't be surprised that he was trying to force every organization and group which employees people such as religious charities and education institutions to pay for abortifacients and contraceptives as if it was some kind of national emergency.
If the government can force us to buy contraceptives and abortifacients, as Obama and his regime claims, why not, as RUSH has argued, force people to buy toothbrushes?
What Obama has done is indefensible and its part of an extremist agenda that has been deceiving and destroying America. Yet we find ourselves arguing with people who defend this man or don't even the truth about him or any of these outrageous and tremendously incredible positions and calls which have been severely unAmerican and alarming.
Don't take my word for it and especially don't take Obama and the Democrats word for it. Just look around record numbers of unemployment record breaking levels of people taking food stamps. Gas prices way up. Yet no attempt is made to cut spending which is out of control.
As Bill Whittle has pointed out, Iraq and Afghanistan, plus other military costs and discretionary spending combine to make 18% of spending in total of what was spent in 2011. The rest of all the money was for everything else the government does. Most of the money is domestic spending and that's what needs to be cut because all the programs and benefits are the main reason for the debt. The rise of gas prices is like the rise in the price of precious metals such as gold, silver, and it will keep going up especially as the value of the dollar goes down.
This is how America is being destroyed through economic warfare. This is exactly what Columbia professors declared in the "Cloward-Piven" Strategy : to cause economic collapse and crisis in order to force everyone into a socialist/communist system. This program and agenda has been in play for a very long time. The Democratic Party has been the political front for this plan and the unions and immigrant rights issues are only the way in which the leaders of this manipulation get more votes to gain power in the courts and government agencies to achieve their goals.
Obama is one of these radicals and it takes a radical to know one and to expose and defeat one. That has to be us, people who care about the future of America and who really want to fix our problems instead of "transform" America into something which the constitution was written in order to protect us from. We have to understand what it means to be a radical and what it means to be on the left or on the right because they are not the same thing.
The left is defined by big government "socialist" economic views and the right is the opposition to such a thing. The right is more reliant on tradition and autonomy aka self-reliance. This is why it was such a BIG LIE to claim that Mussolini and Hitler were right wingers; Mussolini wanted the state to have final say and control over businesses and Nazi is short for the German Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei which stands for "National Socialist German Workers Party."
So what about the terms radical and conservative? A radical is a sort of rebel while a conservative is more of a person who wants to protect things as they are. For instance, a KGB agent in the totalitarian USSR would fit the description of conservative, but if this agent was on American soil he would be considered radical because the supreme law of the US frames and defines a system of limited government and free enterprise. That's the US constitution which defines a people who have a government in order that it doesn't become the other way around: a government which controls a people.

Monday, February 20, 2012

I posted this to Obamas facebook

Earlier today I posted this to Obama's facebook from a Tablet which was having issues and thought I should share it here also:  
hey Barack I like the way you got California to lower its education standards and pay more, have less of a say, and after this say, "thanks master, pllease let me have another" like a whipped , dependent and helpless sheeple.. How did u get California to give you its votes dude? Have you thanked the L.A. Times for hiding and keeping that video of yo and Rashid Khalidi from the public yet? Its in that 2008 article by Andrew C McCarthy. Just a mention. To everyone ese here : how about we CHANGE it back people! Change it all back and kick out the bums who do what they can to overthrow the American way openly defying the American constitution .and who put people in place and positions such as Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who actually recommend ed to another country that this American constitution which she swore an oath to uphold is no longer relevant or recommended in the world of 2012. because these people believe that the government should have more power and control over our lives . which our constitution was designed to prohibit. eople pay more for the "privilege" of such nonsensee. nmeanwhile the people are told that the government is not spending enough and other such nonsense ch as the idea that government creates jobs s and private enterprise causes poverty and unemployment! I think that is actually backwards and everyone knows it. But then gain what else do you expect except rising unemployment rising food stamp participation rising inflationary pressures throughout the economy and mediocre performance after agovernment and revolutionary political and academic hack Saul Alinsky army led by apresident who was raised by a communist mother, abandoned by a communist economist Kenyan father who wrote some book on "our socialism" and raised by a grandfather who took this president to be mentored by communist Alinskytype organizer/lawyer propagandist "uncle" Frank Marshall Davis.

See also:

AND ALSO The details and the parts of the story of the Palestinian Israeli conflict which you might not learn if you listen to Rashid Khalidi, Barack Obama (Look up the two names together plus Los Angeles Times*) and other extremists and shady characters:

(From 2008: The Los Angeles Times Suppresses Obama's Khalidi Tape by former federal prosecutor who got convictions against 1993 New York WTC bombers, ANDREW C. McCARTHY http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/226104/i-l-times-i-suppresses-obamas-khalidi-bash-tape/andrew-c-mccarthy)

Friday, February 3, 2012

State of the Union: A Conservative Response

Maybe we should try to understand our situation a little better.

Angelo Codevilla in his Claremont Review of Books essay, The Chosen One points out:

"...SINCE THE DAYS OF KARL MARX'S FIRST INTERNATIONAL A CENTURY AND A HALF AGO, THIS VERY HUMAN OPPOSITION BETWEEN SOCIALISTIC THEORY (EGALITARIANISM) AND SOCIALIST REALITY (OLIGARCHIC OPPRESSION) HAS BEDEVILED THE LEFT. Marx laid the problem bare in his "Critique of the Gotha Program" (1875). Lenin dealt with it honestly and brutally in What Is to Be Done? (1902)—the foundational document of Communism. By acknowledging that the Communist Party is not the common people's representative, but rather its "vanguard," Leninists were comfortable with a party responsible only to itself and to history, a party that openly demanded deference from the humans whose habits it forcibly reshaped. Communism's undeniable horrors forced the New Left to disassociate itself from What Is to Be Done? and once again to pretend that its socialism was neither oligarchic nor coercive, that somehow it was on the side of ordinary folks. This is a much tougher sell in the 21st century than it was in the 19th. Contemporary socialists try to explain away the common man's suspicion of them as harbingers of oligarchy, corruption, and coercion by resorting to jargon (e.g., "false consciousness" and "socio-economic anxiety"). But that is ever less convincing. THIS IS WHY THE MOVEMENT ARGUES SO STRENUOUSLY WITH ITSELF ABOUT WHETHER AND HOW MUCH IT SHOULD DISSIMULATE ITS AGENDA."
(The essay from which the above quote is taken discusses and analyzes Dreams from my Father by BARACK OBAMA; The Audacity of Hope by BARACK OBAMA; Radical-in-Chief by STANLEY KURTZ and other books which show Obama's extremist ties and ideologically Marxist pedigree and upbringing. It goes a long way towards understanding the mentality towards the American people and form of government which Barack Hussein Obama holds.)

This brings us to David Horowitz's Freedom Center pamphlet, Barack Obama's Rules For Revolution: THE ALINSKY MODEL...

This pamphlet gets into the "popular front" vs. the up-front revolutionary agenda of utopian hardliners and hacks such as Barack Obama. Understanding' Obama and the left's intellectual leaders and influences is key to understanding what is happening in America today.

Quoting from Horowitz:

My parents, who were card-carrying Communists, never referred to themselves as Communists but always as "progressives," as did their friends and political comrades. The "Progressive Party" was created by the Communist Party to challenge Harry Truman in the 1948 election because he opposed the spread of Stalin's empire. The Progressive Party was led by Roosevelt's vice president, HENRY WALLACE, and was the vehicle chosen by Communists to lead their followers out of the Democratic Party, which they had joined during the "popular front" of the 1930s. The progressives rejoined the Democrats during the McGovern campaign of 1972 and with the formation of a hundred-plus member Progressive Caucus in the congressional party and the ascension of Barack Obama to the presidency to become its most important political force.
As David Horowitz points out, "THERE'S NOTHING NEW ABOUT RADICALS CAMOUFLAGING THEIR AGENDAS AS MODERATE IN ORDER TO DISARM THEIR OPPOSITION [...] It was Lenin's idea too, from whom Alinsky appropriated it in the first place." (See Horowitz quoting p. 37 of Rules for Radials by Saul Alinsky)

It doesn't seem that there is enough education on what the Cold War, between the Soviet Union and the United States, Communism and Capitalism, was about. It is all very superficial and conveniently glossed over. No real general understanding about why and how limited government and economic freedom and liberty works and how Communism fails while violating the principles and rights which the American constitution is there to safeguard.

People don't really understand why some are so motivated and hellbent on the betrayal of America and liberty in the first place. This, too, must be explored and explained. It is not merely "esoteric discussion."

Why is America in such shambles today? Most Americans believed America to be this indestructable titan, and giant in science, progress and economics. Yet look around at the moral, economic, and spirtitual wasteland that is becoming more and more prevalent in this country.

There was a false sense of security because people had good reason to believe that no foe, no enemy could defeat and destroy America. Especially in a military confrontation. None really wanted to believe, to notice, or take seriously the threat and danger from within, which continues its war against America and her values. Yet, we see a more and more offensive and audacious army and network of organizations working (academically, politically, culturally) to push God away from America and the American mind while strengthening the powers of government and the would-be masterminds who know how to rule society and the economy better than the citizens themselves.   

People don't believe that some people would WANT to achieve this result, which America's enemies from abroad have called for, the destruction of America.  

They "can’t really want to destroy a society that is democratic and liberal, and more equal than other." Horowitz, and I, say "OH YES THEY CAN." You just have to put yourself in the Communist/Marxist and "we can't wait" mindframe:

There is no goodness that trumps the dream [and promise]of a heaven on earth. And because America is a real world society, managed by real and problematic human beings, it will never be equal, or liberal, or democratic enough to satisfy radical fantasies to compensate them for their longing for a perfect world [...] Compared to this heaven even America is hell.

So, having a better understanding of motive and of the "why" (the desire to achieve misguided utopian promises based on the myopic dogma of Karl Marx which the current president was fed by his Marxist mother Stanley Ann Dunn Ham to Frank M Davis and through his life as he self-reinforced this erronious and destructive point of view,) we can go back to examining the "how" of where America is today.
In pages 18 and 19 of Barack Obama's Rules For Revolution: The Alinsky Model we find that

While the Communist Left pretended to be Jeffersonian Democrats and "progressives" and formed "popular fronts" with liberals, the New Left radicals disdained these deceptions, REGARDING THEM AS A DISPLAY OF WEAKNESS [and inauthenticity.] To distinguish themselves from such popular front politics, sixties radicals said they were revolutionaries and proud of it.

New Left radicals despised and attacked liberals and created riots at the Democratic Party conventions. Their typical slogans were "Up againt the wall motherf-ker" and "Off the pig", telegraphing exactly how they felt [...] THE MOST BASIC PRINCIPLE OF ALINSKY'S ADVICE TO RADICALS IS TO LIE TO THEIR OPPONENTS AND DISARM THEM BY PRETENDING TO BE MODERATES AND LIBERALS.

Deception is the radical's most important weapon, and it has been a prominent one since the end of the sixties. Racial arsonists such as Al Sharpton and Jeremiah Wright pose as civil rights activists; anti-American radicals such as BILL AYERS pose as patriotic progressives; SOCIALISTS POSE AS LIBERALS. The mark of their success is reflected in the fact that conservatives collude in the deception and call them liberals as well.
Here's another key point:

CONSERVATIVES THINK OF WAR AS A METAPHOR WHEN APPLIED TO POLITICS. FOR RADICALS, THE WAR IS REAL. That is why when partisans of the left go into battle, they set out to destroy their opponents by stigmatizing them as "racists," "sexists," [...] It is also why they so often pretend to be what they are not ("liberals" for example) and rarely say what they mean. Deception for them is a military tactic in a war that is designed to eliminate the enemy. Alinsky's Rules for Radicals is first of all a comradely critique of the sixties' New Left. What bothers Alinsky about these radicals is their honesty - which may have been their only redeeming feature [...] THERE'S NOTHING NEW ABOUT RADICALS CAMOUFLAGING THEIR AGENDAS AS MODERATE IN ORDER TO DISARM THEIR OPPOSITION [...] It was Lenin's idea too, from whom Alinsky appropriated it in the first place.

Lenin is one of Alinsky's heroes (Castro is another). ALINSKY INVOKES LENIN IN THE COURSE OF CHIDING THE RHETORICAL RADICALS OVER A FAMOUS SIXTIES SLOGAN, which originated with the Chinese Communist dictator Mao Zedong. The slogan was "political power grows out of the barrel of a gun," and during the 1960s it was a favorite cry of the Black Panthers and other radical groups. Regarding this, Alinsky comments: "'Power comes out of the barrel of a gun' is an absurd rallying cry when the other side has all the guns. LENIN WAS A PRAGMATIST; WHEN HE RETURNED TO WHAT WAS THEN PETROGRAD FROM EXILE, HE SAID THAT THE BOLSHEVIKS STOOD FOR GETTING POWER THROUGH THE BALLOT BUT WOULD RECONSIDER AFTER THEY GOT THE GUNS." (Rules for Radicals, p. 37)

I'll leave it at that.

(P.S. If you would like to get copies of Barack Obama's Rules for Radicals: THE ALINSKY MODEL, they are available at the FrontPageMagazine.com BOOKSTORE for $3.00 a piece and $1 dollar a piece when purchasing 25 or more copies. Its is not the cheap kind of paper but of the high-quality waxy/glossy higher end stuff and a very handy size. Pass these around to friends and please share and link to this post if you found it useful. Thank you. )